MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2468937966 · doi:10.1109/embsisc.2016.7508598

Predicting novel protein-protein interactions between the HIV-1 virus and homo sapiens

2016· article· en· W2468937966 on OpenAlexaff
Bradley Barnes, Maryam Karimloo, Andrew Schoenrock, Daniel Burnside, Edana Cassol, Alex Wong, Frank Dehne, Ashkan Golshani, James R. Green

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMachine Learning in Bioinformatics
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)Protein–protein interactionComputer scienceVirusComputational biologyHomo sapiensBiologyVirologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The HIV-1 virus affects millions of people around the world. Identifying novel protein-protein interactions (PPIs) between HIV and humans would lead to a better understanding of the virus and possibly to new treatment targets. The Proteinprotein Interaction Prediction Engine (PIPE) is a broadly applicable, highly precise, and computationally efficient method of predicting PPIs. Here, PIPE is used to predict new host-virus protein interactions in order to generate new testable hypotheses and to guide future biological experiments. In total, 229 new interactions were predicted at high confidence, with an estimated recall of 22.5% and specificity of 99.95%. Some of these interactions may be verified experimentally in the future.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMachine Learning in BioinformaticsFrench-language works237,207