MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF CANCELLOUS BONE OF THE DISTAL HUMERUS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Three 3mm transverse slices were sectioned from the distal cancellous region of seven fresh-frozen cadaveric humerii. Each slice was marked with a 3x3mm grid, and subjected to compressive testing using a flat cylindrical indenter (1.6mm diameter). Indentation modulus and strength were calculated for each site, and pooled into nine anatomically-defined regions. The most distal slice had higher moduli values (p To quantify the indentation strength and modulus of distal humeral cancellous bone, and identify any regional variations. Cancellous bone modulus in the distal humerus decreases from distal to proximal. The posterior capitellum has a lower modulus than the other regions of the distal humerus. The influence of slice depth emphasizes the importance of minimizing the amount of bone removed during prosthetic replacement. Regional variations in modulus suggest that the posterior capitellum should be avoided during fixation of implants or placement of screws. Three 3mm transverse cancellous bone slices obtained from the distal end of each of seven fresh-frozen cadaveric specimens were subjected to compressive testing using a materials testing machine with a 1.6mm flat cylindrical indenter. Testing was performed in a 3x3mm grid. The indentation modulus and local strength were calculated for each test site, and then averaged into nine regions defined by the capitellum, medial and lateral trochlea, and anterior, central and posterior sections for each slice. Mean modulus was found to be 309.8±242.0 MPa (range: 2.9–1041.7 MPa). Yield strength averaged 4.4±2.5 MPa (range: 0.6–16.3 MPa). The highest modulus was found in the distal-most slice (p Funding: Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council; University of Western Ontario
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".