MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2469106161

Accessing and Processing Real-Time GPS Corrections for Precise Point Positioning … Some User Considerations

2005· article· en· W2469106161 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Paul Collins, Yang Gao, F. Lahaye, Pierre Héroux, Kenneth G. MacLeod, K. Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the 18th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of The Institute of Navigation (ION GNSS 2005) · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGNSS positioning and interference
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGlobal Positioning SystemPseudorangeDifferential GPSComputer scienceTime transferGPS disciplined oscillatorPrecise Point PositioningReal-time computingPrecision Lightweight GPS ReceiverGeodetic datumServerAssisted GPSGeodesyGPS signalsGNSS applicationsTelecommunicationsGeographyGps receiverComputer network
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Natural Resources Canada makes its GPS Corrections (GPS·C) available in real-time through the Canada-wide Differential GPS Service. These corrections have also recently become available over the Internet using prototype UDP and TCP servers. The latter uses the NTRIP model of data transfer to allow, in part, for the creation of Virtual Reference Stations and the production of RTCM-SC104 local-area corrections for Differential GPS. In addition, both servers provide high-precision wide-area corrections in a modified RTCA-SC159 format to provide the necessary precision to eventually realize real-time Precise Point Positioning (PPP) to the subdecimetre level. Obtaining the highest possible accuracy from GPS corrections requires an awareness of the clock reference, or datum, to which they refer. The pseudorange measurements selected for the correction computation determine the clock reference for those corrections. The GPS·C corrections are currently referenced to the C/A (C1) and P2´ (C1+P2-P1) pseudorange observables and users must match these to achieve the best possible accuracy. Failure to do so can degrade positioning precision by up to a factor of three or more.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score0.086

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0230.014

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the 18th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of The Institute of Navigation (ION GNSS 2005)Same topicGNSS positioning and interferenceFrench-language works237,207