MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Cerebral And Cardiac Hemodynamics During Exercise Are Related To Cognitive Function In Heart Transplant Recipients

2016· article· en· W2469302419 on OpenAlexaff
Paula Aver Bretanha Ribeiro, Maxime Boidin, Anil Nigam, Sarah Fraser, Louis Bherer, Martin Juneau, Michel White, Mathieu Gayda

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTransplantation: Methods and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsConcordia UniversityMontreal Heart Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImpedance cardiographyCardiologyMedicineCardiac function curveHemodynamicsInternal medicineCardiac outputCardiac indexHeart rateWorking memoryTrail Making TestNeuropsychologyCognitionPsychologyHeart failureBlood pressureStroke volume

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Heart transplant recipients (HTR) have an impaired VO2max, maximal cardiac output and peripheral vascular function compared to healthy age-matched subjects. Previous studies showed a reduced cerebral oxygenation and perfusion (COP) during exercise in HTR, but the relationship of COP with cognitive function is not clear. We aimed to analyze differences and correlations among COP, maximal cardiac index (CImax), VO2peak and cognitive function between heart transplant recipients and age-matched healthy subjects. METHOD: Twelve stable HTR (55±11 years) and 12 age-matched healthy subjects (55±12 years) were recruited for this pilot trial. In HTR, the mean time after transplantation was 6.8±5.4 years. Left frontal COP (NIRS: Oxymon Mk III, Netherlands) and cardiac hemodynamics (impedance cardiography: PhysioFlow, France) were measured during a maximal cardiopulmonary ergocycle test (Oxycon Pro; CareFusion, Jaegger, Germany). Cognitive function was evaluated at rest by a complete neuropsychological test battery (13 different items) and raw composite score were calculated for 4 different domains: 1) working memory (WM); 2) processing speed (PS); 3) Executive function (EF); and 4) Verbal memory (VM). ANOVA was used to test groups’ differences and Pearson or Spearman correlations were used to evaluate the relationship between cognitive function, COP (oxyhemoglobin: O2Hb, total hemoglobin: THb, CImax and VO2peak). Statistical significance was p<0.05. RESULTS: VO2peak (p=0.0005), CImax (p=0.0112), EF (p=0.0148) and WM (p=0.0194) were lower in HTR vs. HS; and a tendency for lower O2Hb (p=0.0921), THb (p=0.0720) and VM (p=0.0728) was observed. VM was positively correlated with VO2peak (p=0.034) and CImax (p=0.006); and EF was negatively correlated with VO2peak (p= 0.0001) and CImax (p=0.005) (figure 1); and O2Hb had a tendency to be correlated to EF (p=0.071) and VM (p=0.085). CONCLUSION: Our preliminary results demonstrated that cognitive function, especially verbal memory and executive function were related to VO2peak and maximal cardiac index in heart transplant recipients. We also believe that reduced COP could be related to cognitive function in these subjects, but there is no enough power to confirm this hypothesis. Supported by:ÉPIC Foundation and CNPq.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise→Same topicTransplantation: Methods and Outcomes→French-language works237,207→