MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2469668684 · doi:10.2298/jmmb150430016g

Hydrothermal decomposition of industrial jarosite in alkaline media: The rate determining step of the process kinetics

2016· article· en· W2469668684 on OpenAlexaff
A.A. González-Ibarra, F. Nava‐Alonso, J.C. Fuentes-Aceituno, A. Uribe‐Salas

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Mining and Metallurgy Section B Metallurgy · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMetal Extraction and Bioleaching
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersConsejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología
KeywordsJarositeParticle sizeDecompositionHydrothermal circulationDiffusionKineticsTailingsParticle (ecology)ChemistryMineralogyChemical process of decompositionParticle-size distributionChemical engineeringMaterials scienceNuclear chemistryAnalytical Chemistry (journal)MetallurgyPhysical chemistryChromatographyGeologyOrganic chemistryThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work examines the role of NaOH and Ca(OH)2 on the hydrothermal decomposition of industrial jarosite deposited by a Mexican company in a tailings dam. The industrial jarosite is mainly composed by natrojarosite and contains 150 g Ag/t, showing a narrow particle size distribution, as revealed by XRD, fire assay, SEM-EDS and laser-diffraction analysis. The effect of the pH, when using NaOH or Ca(OH)2 as alkalinizing agent was studied by carrying out decomposition experiments at different pH values and 60?C in a homogeneous size particle system (pH = 8, 9, 10 and 11) and in a heterogeneous size particle system (pH = 11). Also, the kinetic study of the process and the controlling step of the decomposition reaction when NaOH and Ca(OH)2 are used was determined by fitting the data obtained to the shrinking core model for spherical particles of constant size. These results, supported by chemical (EDS), morphological (SEM) and mapping of elements (EDS) analysis of a partially reacted jarosite particle allowed to conclude that when NaOH is used, the process kinetics is controlled by the chemical reaction and when Ca(OH)2 is used, the rate determining step is changed to a diffusion control through a layer of solid products.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.085
Threshold uncertainty score0.344

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Mining and Metallurgy Section B MetallurgySame topicMetal Extraction and BioleachingFrench-language works237,207