Clinical analysis of primary systemic anaplastic large cell lymphoma: a report of 57 cases.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The clinical characteristics and prognosis of primary systemic anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) are various according to different reports. Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), a specific marker of primary systemic ALCL, is related with its clinical characteristics and prognosis. This study was to investigate the clinical characteristics and prognosis of primary systemic ALCL, and to explore the expression and clinical significance of ALK. METHODS: Clinical data of 57 primary systemic ALCL patients, treated in Cancer Center of Sun Yat-sen University from January 1997 to January 2006, were reviewed. The expression of ALK in 46 tumor specimens was detected by SP immunohisochemistry. RESULTS: The median age of the 57 patients was 30. The male/female ratio was 1.9:1. Of the 57 patients, 33 (57.9%) had B symptoms, 23 (40.4%) had Ann Arbor stage III-IV tumors, and 23 (40.4%) had extranodal disease at diagnosis. All patients received chemotherapy. Of the 56 evaluable patients, 40 (71.4%) achieved complete remission. The overall response rate was 96.4%. With a median follow-up of 49.1 months, the median time to progression was 35.2 months and the expected 5-year survival rate was 65.2%. The expected 5-year survival rate was significantly higher in low/low-intermediate International Prognostic Index (IPI) risk group than in high-intermediate/high IPI risk group (68.9% vs. 33.3%, p = 0.010). The positive rate of ALK was 63.0% in the 46 cases detected. Compared with ALK-negative patients, ALK-positive patients were younger (p = 0.001) and had higher expected 5-year survival rate (p < 0.01). Multivariate analysis confirmed the independent prognostic values of ALK expression, primary disease site and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level. CONCLUSIONS: Primary systemic ALCL usually occurs in young patients, with good response to chemotherapy and good prognosis. No ALK expression, high-intermediate/high IPI, extranodal disease and elevated LDH level are correlated to unfavorable prognosis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".