MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2470263265 · doi:10.1057/9781137434838_8

The End of the World as They Know It: Revelations about Revelation

2014· book-chapter· en· W2470263265 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Eugene V. Gallagher

Bibliographic record

VenuePalgrave Macmillan US eBooks · 2014
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicViolence, Religion, and Philosophy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRevelationHistoryArtAncient historyLiterature

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the 1990s several incidents seemed to point to a frightening connection between millennialism and violence. For example, an obscure group of Bible students dedicated to understanding the extraordinary prophecies of the book of Revelation burst into the media glare when agents of the US Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms botched a raid on their headquarters outside of Waco, Texas at the end of February 1993. The ensuing armed standoff reached its awful dénouement on April 19, when a fire took the lives of nearly everyone inside the Branch Davidians’ Mount Carmel Center. In October 1994, anticipating the Second Coming of Jesus, more than 50 members of The Order of the Solar Temple perished in Switzerland and Quebec in murder-suicides; in 1995 another fifteen died in France, and in 1997 another five in Canada. On March 20, 1995, an eclectic Japanese millennial group garnered the attention and opprobrium of the world when it released deadly sarin gas inside the Tokyo subway. Its leader, Shoko Asahara, had become convinced that the events prophesied by the book of Revelation concerning “Armageddon” were being played out. Finally, on March 26, 1997, 39 followers of Marshall Herff Applewhite donned purple shrouds and Nike sneakers and washed down doses of phenobarbitol mixed with applesauce or pudding.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.018
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.063

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.018
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0260.066
Scholarly communication0.0160.035
Open science0.0010.015
Research integrity0.0060.023
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePalgrave Macmillan US eBooksSame topicViolence, Religion, and PhilosophyFrench-language works237,207