The family as a rehabilitation resource : the assessment and application of family strengths and weaknesses in the rehabilitation of male arthritic patients: Canadian Arthritis and Rheumatism Society (B.C. Division), Medical Centre, 1955-58
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Physical disability resulting from arthritis is a widespread problem: when the sufferer is the breadwinner of a family, it is particularly serious, creating the need for special services not only for the disabled person, but also for his family. But the treatment potential of the patient also depends on how far his family is in turn a source of strength or weakness to him. This is a casework "dimension" that is far from fully explored. This thesis considers the family as a treatment resource in the rehabilitation of a group of male arthritic breadwinners who have been in-patients at the Canadian Arthritis and Rheumatism Society (B.C. Division) Medical centre in Vancouver, B. C, for at least three months. While focusing on the patient in his family group, the study undertakes an intensive examination of the material found in case records and related correspondence from the Medical Centre's Social Service Department, a clinical social work setting. The outcome of the exploration was to emphasize two approaches: (a) the recognition of factors in family behaviour toward the patient which connote family strength, and (b) their application in casework to help meet the patient's needs. Four comparative cases (two each of "strong" and "weak" examples) were selected to identify the variables affecting employment, treatment, and family interaction. The results of this analysis were then applied to the process of diagnosis and treatment to the total cases (seven) for which clinical and social information was available. The specific findings are (1) that the patient's family could influence positively the patient's rehabilitation potential; (2) that family strength could be recognized in a clinical setting treating the patient; (3) that certain additional kinds of diagnostic information are required prior to the patient's admission to the Medical Centre for treatment. A rating scale of family strength can be envisaged as an experimental counterpart of this complex adjustment process. Some practical implications for future service are discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".