MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2470706110 · doi:10.1002/mop.29978

Study of microstrip line‐fed flower‐shaped patch antenna providing enhanced bandwidth and radiation efficiency

2016· article· en· W2470706110 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Situ Rani Patre, Surya Pal Singh

Bibliographic record

VenueMicrowave and Optical Technology Letters · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAntenna Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersHuman Resources and Skills Development Canada
KeywordsPatch antennaMicrostrip antennaHFSSRadiation patternGround planeCoaxial antennaAntenna efficiencyAntenna measurementOpticsMonopole antennaFeed lineAntenna factorAcousticsPhysicsAntenna (radio)EngineeringElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT This article presents the simulation and experimental studies of a broadband flower‐shaped patch antenna with semi‐elliptical partial ground plane fed through tapered microstrip line. The conventional circular patch is reshaped to obtain the proposed broadband flower‐shaped patch, which has distinct smaller segments and larger perimeter without changing the (largest) patch radius. The effect of different configurations of feed line and ground plane on the impedance bandwidth of the antenna is studied through simulation using Ansys' High Frequency Structure Simulator (HFSS) software. The simulated and measured bandwidths of the proposed antenna with optimum configurations of feed line and ground plane for input VSWR ≤ 2 are found to be 142% (2.3–13.6 GHz) and 135.88% (2.1–11.0 GHz), respectively. The radiation patterns of the antenna are bidirectional and omni‐directional in E‐ and H‐plane respectively. The proposed antenna has high radiation efficiency of more than 80% and reasonable gain over whole operating frequency band. Further, the input and radiation characteristics of the proposed antenna are compared with the respective characteristics of identical antenna excited using coplanar waveguide (CPW) feed. The bandwidth improvement of proposed antenna compared to reference one is explained using leaky wave concept. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Microwave Opt Technol Lett 58:2041–2046, 2016

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.164
Threshold uncertainty score0.517

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMicrowave and Optical Technology LettersSame topicAntenna Design and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207