MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2470952219 · doi:10.1353/jur.2010.0036

Kirchenrecht und Theologie im Leben der Kirche. Festschrift für Heinrich J. F. Reinhardt zur Vollendung seines 65. Lebensjahres ed. by Rüdiger Althaus, Klaus Lüdicke and Matthias Pulte

2010· article· de· W2470952219 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Michael Nobel

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œJurist/˜The œjurist · 2010
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTheology and Canon Law Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGermanHonorPhilosophyHumanitiesTheologyClassicsHistoryComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

KIRCHENRECHT UND THEOLOGIE IM LEBEN DER KIRCHE. FESTSCHRIFT FÜR HEINRICH J. F. REINHARDT ZUR VOLLENDUNG SEINES 65. LEBENSJAHRES Rüdiger Althaus, Klaus Lüdicke and Matthias Pulte (eds.). Beihefte zum Münsterischen Kommentar , vol. 50. Essen: Ludgerus Verlag, 2007. To honor Heinrich J. F. Reinhardt, Professor of Canon Law at the Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Diocese of Essen on his sixty-fifth birthday, the editors invited his colleagues from various disciplines to participate in this Festschrift to express their esteem for this prominent German canonist. This Festschrift is divided into two main chapters: chapter one is on canon law (26 articles) and chapter two is on the theology and history of the Church and the ecumenical movement (12 articles). Four articles are presented to demonstrate briefly the great value of this Festschrift: Rüdiger Althaus’s study addresses reforms at the parish level with a special focus on financial aspects (pp. 31–50). The current issues , mostly various forms of parish clustering, are at various stages of implementation; such a variety of concepts precludes a uniform solution to financial concerns. The author highlights effects of parish clustering before he concludes with recommendations on various questions. Franz Kalde’s article on the papal bull Germanicae gentis (February 23, 1957) deals with the erection of the diocese of Essen on January 1, 1958 (pp. 231–252). The author examines the external and internal characteristics of the bull, commenting on their content from a canonical point of view with a special focus on cause, motivation, details, and individual dispositions. Johannes Madey studies the title and canonical position of the archiepiscopus maior of the Eastern Catholic Churches (pp. 333–345). The author points out the advantage of having a well defined terminology in the CCEO. The title archiepiscopus maior is used for a pastor with supra-metropolitan power and nearly in the same position as a patriarch with the few exceptions indicated in the CCEO. Karl-Heinz Selge presents possibilities of merging tribunal and pastoral ministry when it comes to a declaration of nullity of a marriage (pp. 389–410). Ministers in tribunals do not simply fulfill their function in the jurisdictional order (Dignitas connubii, art. 308). Existing pastoral care offices, on the other hand, do not fulfill their function only in pastoral matters. Both offices intersect in various forms of collaboration to assist and guide those approaching such ministers because of a failed marriage. 496 the jurist book reviews 497 This book contains much wisdom and valuable information—canonical , theological, and historical. The authors present their articles in a scientific manner with extensive footnotes. Experienced canonists and novices will find this book a helpful source of information. Michael Nobel St. Paul University Ottawa, Ontario LA MOTIVACIÓN DEL DECRETOADMINISTRATIVO SINGULAR EN EL DERECHO CANÓNICO by Estanislao Mazzuchelli Urquijo. Thesis ad Doctoratum in Iure Canonico. Roma: Pontificia Universitas Sanctæ Crucis, Facultas Iuris Canonici, 2007. Book I of the Code of Canon Law, General Norms, is of particular importance in the administrative life of the Church. For example, more than simply administrative praxis, the canons assist in the implementation of certain suggestions approved by the 1967 synod of bishops concerning the revision of the code, such as the protection of rights and fostering the pastoral care of souls. While many canons repeat previous norms, and thus, according to canon 6 §2, must be interpreted in light also [etiam] of the canonical tradition, the use of etiam indicates that the canons must take cognizance of developments in the law and certain essential keys to interpretation, such as the conciliar doctrine on the Church (e.g., Sacrae disciplinae leges). This dissertation makes an important contribution to such an analysis of book I of the code. More specifically, as the author states in his Introduction , the text investigates “the motivation of singular administrative acts in canon law,” specifically, canons 51 of the Code of Canon Law (CIC) and canon 1519 §2 of the Code of Canons of the Eastern Churches (CCEO) with analysis of the various implications deriving from such an investigation. These implications include such questions as the description of a decision; the difference between a decision and a provision; the meaning of expressing the...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.495
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0080.010
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue˜The œJurist/˜The œjuristSame topicTheology and Canon Law StudiesFrench-language works237,207