MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2471641206 · doi:10.1002/cctc.201600509

Palladium Nanoparticle Size Effect in Hydrodesulfurization of 4,6‐Dimethyldibenzothiophene (4,6‐DMDBT)

2016· article· en· W2471641206 on OpenAlexafffund
Jing Shen, Natalia Semagina

Bibliographic record

VenueChemCatChem · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCatalysis and Hydrodesulfurization Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersInstitute for Oil Sands Innovation, University of AlbertaUniversity of Alberta
KeywordsSulfurChemistryHydrodesulfurizationPalladiumFlue-gas desulfurizationNanoparticleCatalysisAdsorptionYield (engineering)SelectivityInorganic chemistryOrganic chemistryNanotechnologyMaterials scienceMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Pd nanoparticle size sensitivity of 4,6‐dimethyldibenzothiophene (4,6‐DMDBT) hydrodesulfurization was investigated by using 4, 8, 13, and 87 nm particles and was compared with the sulfur‐free and sulfur‐inhibited hydrogenation of 3,3‐dimethylbiphenyl, which is a product of direct desulfurization of 4,6‐DMDBT. The smallest 4 nm particles provided unprecedented (for Pd at 5 MPa and 300 °C) direct desulfurization selectivity of 20 % at 40 % conversion because of the reduced contribution of the hydrogenation path. The 4 nm particles were poisoned by the adsorbed sulfur to the greatest extent. The optimal size, providing the highest Pd mass‐based yield of the desulfurized products, was found to be 8 nm. The catalyst with 87 nm particles was based on Pd nanocubes with the lowest edge/terrace surface atom ratio and large terraces and this showed the lowest sulfur extraction from both 4,6‐DMDBT and sulfurous intermediates as a result of the low availability of edge atoms for a perpendicular sigma‐mode adsorption through the lone pair of the sulfur atom.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.559

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemCatChemSame topicCatalysis and Hydrodesulfurization StudiesFrench-language works237,207