Prodromal Clinical Markers of Parkinson disease in Gaucher Disease Individuals
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Heterozygous mutations in the glucocerebrosidase (GBA) gene have been reported as a common risk factor for the development of Parkinson's disease (PD) in Gaucher disease (GD) patients and in heterozygous GBA mutation positive carriers. In this study, we analyzed the occurrence of prodromal markers of PD in an Argentinean cohort with type 1 GD. After signed informed consent, we evaluated 26 patients with type 1 GD under enzymatic replacement therapy from a cohort of the Hospital Ricardo Gutierrez GD Study Group in Buenos Aires City, Argentina. We performed an extensive neurological examination, including cognitive assessment by Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and a questionnaire performed ad hoc, to identify non-motor PD symptoms. Parasomnias were reported by 7 patients (26.92%), rapid eye movement behavior disorders in 2 (7.69%), constipation in 2 (7.69%), hyposmia in 1 (3.84%), tremor in 1 (3.84%), and depression in 3 cases (11.53%). MoCA assessment was abnormal in 44.44% of patients. No patient fulfilled PD diagnostic criteria (Queen Square Brain Bank criteria). The identification of prodromal markers of PD in type 1 GD suggests that this population represents a very interesting cohort for identifying potential biomarkers and neuroprotective therapies for PD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it