MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2472313964 · doi:10.47276/lr.84.4.322

Mistreatment of Immigrants: the History of Leprosy in Canada

2013· letter· en· W2472313964 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Brittany Kula, Joan Robinson

Bibliographic record

VenueLeprosy Review · 2013
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLeprosy Research and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLeprosyMedicineImmigrationChinatownResidenceGovernment (linguistics)UnemploymentPopulationDisfigurementRacismEthnologySocioeconomicsDemographyEconomic growthEnvironmental healthHistorySociologySurgeryGender studiesArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The authors have no conflicts of interest related to leprosy. No funding was obtained for this project. As a Canadian, one considers leprosy to be an illness associated with isolation and disfigurement relating to ancient civilizations, the Biblical era or remote settlements of the eastern world. However, leprosy held serious implications for Canada at the turn of the 20th century, with two leprosaria established by 1891. The Canadian Pacific Railway was completed in 1885 with much of the labour performed by Chinese immigrants. Following this, the Chinese in the province of British Columbia suffered from staggering unemployment rates and the bankruptcy of local businesses. Caucasians were not immune to this economic decline, and mounting hostility towards the Chinese arose from their willingness to accept reduced salaries in the face of decreasing labour opportunities. As such, the Chinese were marginalised into overcrowded and unsanitary Chinatowns. When in 1891 the sanitary commission for the city of Victoria discovered five individuals with leprosy in Chinatown, the municipal government immediately set to work exiling those affected to D’Arcy Island, about 25 km off the shore. Motivation likely stemmed from the need to avoid another mass protest against the Chinese immigrant population like the one that occurred in 1887. The public was relieved that the leprosy in the area was ‘relocated’, and it was reported that the majority of locals were indifferent to the sufferers’ fates. By 1906, D’Arcy had seen 23 residents, almost all Chinese. Evidence for racism directed toward the individuals with leprosy on D’Arcy comes from a comparison of the treatment at D’Arcy to its concurrent leprosarium serving a Caucasian population in Tracadie, New Brunswick. At Tracadie – which held 18 individuals by 1902 and 218 throughout its existence – patients were well taken care of by volunteer nuns. – 6 At D’Arcy, however, there was no caretaker so that residents depended on each other to maintain habitable circumstances. As time wore on, the individuals at D’Arcy became increasingly incapacitated by their disease – their digits particularly susceptible to loss of sensation,

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.621
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLeprosy ReviewSame topicLeprosy Research and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207