Superior results following the Ross procedure in patients with congenital heart disease.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: The Ross procedure is a versatile operation that can be applied for aortic valve replacement (AVR) in patients with congenital heart disease (CHD), including small infants and those with complex left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction. Herein, the clinical outcome is reported following the Ross procedure in patients with CHD at the authors' institution. METHODS: The medical records of patients who underwent the Ross procedure for CHD between 1991 and 2007 were reviewed. A competing-risks methodology was used to determine the time-related prevalence and associated factors for three mutually exclusive end states after the Ross procedure, namely death prior to subsequent cardiac reoperation, cardiac reoperation, and survival without subsequent reoperation. RESULTS: A total of 151 patients (98 males, 53 females) was identified. The median age at the time of surgery was 8.6 years (range: 4 days to 33 years). Previously, 103 patients (68%) had undergone cardiac interventions, and 43 (28%) required LVOT enlargement (modified Ross-Konno procedure). A competing-risk analysis showed that, at 10 years after the Ross procedure, 8% of patients had died without subsequent reoperation, 26% underwent cardiac reoperation, and 66% remained alive without further reoperation. The 10-year freedom from autograft and homograft reoperation was 95% and 71%, respectively. Factors associated with early risk of mortality were age < 1 year and no prior surgical/percutaneous intervention at the time of the Ross procedure. Surgical factors associated with cardiac reoperation were concurrent cardiac surgery and the use of fresh homografts. There were no bleeding or thromboembolic complications, and the 15-year freedom from endocarditis was 95%. Ultimately, 99% of the survivors were in NYHA class I or II. CONCLUSION: The Ross procedure remains the authors' procedure of choice for AVR in patients with CHD. Outcomes in infants aged < 1 year may improve with better patient selection and palliative surgical/percutaneous interventions prior to valve replacement. The late survival was excellent and valve-related complications were minimal. The high autograft longevity led to few patients requiring late reoperation for graft replacement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".