Acute Effects of Low-Load/High-Repetition Single-Limb Resistance Training in COPD
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Exercising small muscle groups at a time allows higher muscle specific workloads compared with whole body aerobic exercises in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Whether similar effects also occur with partitioning exercise during low load/high-repetition resistance exercises is uncertain. PURPOSE: To investigate the acute effects of partitioning exercise on exercise workload, exertional symptoms and quadriceps muscle fatigue during low load/high-repetition resistance exercises in people with COPD and healthy controls. METHODS: We compared the acute physiological effects of single-limb (SL) versus two-limb (TL) execution of isokinetic knee extension and of six low load/high-repetition elastic resistance exercises in 20 people with COPD (forced expiratory volume in 1 s = 38% predicted) and 15 healthy controls. RESULTS: Among people with COPD, SL exercises resulted in higher exercise workloads during isokinetic knee extension (17% ± 31%, P < 0.05) and elastic exercises (rowing, 17% ± 23%; leg curl, 23% ± 21%; elbow flexion, 19% ± 26%; chest press, 14% ± 15%; shoulder flexion, 33% ± 24%; and knee extension, 24% ± 18%, all P < 0.05). Muscle fatigue ratings were similar during SL compared with TL exercises, whereas dyspnea ratings were similar between conditions during isokinetic exercises and lower during SL compared with TL elastic exercises (P < 0.05). In COPD, SL knee extension resulted in greater quadriceps fatigue than TL knee extension as evidenced by a greater fall in quadriceps potentiated twitch force after the former exercise (-24% ± 10% vs -16% ± 8%, P = 0.025). In healthy controls, partitioning exercise with SL exercise did not modify workload, quadriceps fatigue nor dyspnea achieved during the various exercises. CONCLUSIONS: Partitioning exercise by exercising using an SL allowed higher muscle localized exercise workloads, larger amount of quadriceps muscle fatigue with lower, or similar level of exertional symptoms during low load/high-repetition resistance exercises in people with advanced COPD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".