Bibliographic record
Abstract
Resumo: O texto apresenta de forma sucinta os elementos e estratégias gerais que caracterizam o policiamento de proximidade. A partir dessa breve revisão com ênfase na doutrina da Polícia Militar de Minas Gerais, é evidenciada a possibilidade de se adotar os princípios do policiamento comunitário em um campo onde atualmente se predomina as estratégias reativas de polícia: tropa de choque. Para demonstrar a validade dessa argumentação, são apresentadas práticas adotadas pela polícia em Belo Horizonte e em Vancouver, Canadá. Palavras-chave: Polícia de Proximidade; Policiamento Comunitário; Tropa de Choque. Abstract: The text summarily points elements and general aspects that characterize community policing. From this brief review, which emphasizes the doctrine of the Minas Gerais Police, it is evidenced the possibility of adopting the principles of community policing in a field where currently predominates reactive police strategies: riot police. To demonstrate the validity of these arguments, some practices used by police in Belo Horizonte and in Vancouver, Canada, are showed. Key words: Proximity approach; Community Policing; Riot Police.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".