MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2473109914 · doi:10.11646/zootaxa.4137.1.9

Timeless standards for species delimitation

2016· article· en· W2473109914 on OpenAlexaff
Dalton S. Amorim, Charles Morphy D. Santos, Frank‐Thorsten Krell, Alain Dubois, Silvio Shigueo Nihei, Otto Müller Patrão de Oliveira, Adrian C. Pont, Hojun Song, Vanessa Kruth Verdade, Diego Aguilar Fachin, Bruna Klassa, Carlos José Einicker Lamas, Sarah Siqueira Oliveira, Cláudio José Barros de Carvalho, Cátia Antunes de Mello-Patiu, Eduardo Hajdu, Márcia Souto Couri, Vera Cristina Silva, RENATO S. CAPELLARI, Rafaela Lopes Falaschi, Rodrigo M. Feitosa, Lorenzo Prendini, José P. Pombal, Fernando Fernández, Rosana Moreira da Rocha, John E. Lattke, Ulisses Caramaschi, Marcelo Duarte, António Carlos Marques, Roberto Esser dos Reis, Olavi Kurina, Daniela M. Takiya, Marcos Tavares, Daniel Silva Fernandes, Francisco Luís Franco, Fabiana Cuezzo, Dennis R. Paulson, Benoît Guénard, Birgit C. Schlick‐Steiner, Wolfgang Arthofer, Florian M. Steiner, Brian L. Fisher, Robert A. Johnson, Thibaut Delsinne, David A. Donoso, Pablo R. Mulieri, Luciano Damián Patitucci, James M. Carpenter, Lee Herman, David A. Grimaldi

Bibliographic record

VenueZootaxa · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicDiptera species taxonomy and behavior
Canadian institutionsMinnow Environmental (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyHolotypeMarketing buzzTimelessEcologyZoologyTaxonomy (biology)World Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recently a new species of bombyliid fly, Marleyimyia xylocopae, was described by Marshall & Evenhuis (2015) based on two photographs taken during fieldwork in the Republic of South Africa. This species has no preserved holotype. The paper generated some buzz, especially among dipterists, because in most cases photographs taken in the field provide insufficient information for properly diagnosing and documenting species of Diptera.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.164
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.258
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.164
Threshold uncertainty score0.867

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.1640.258
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0130.008
Science and technology studies0.0060.009
Scholarly communication0.0090.012
Open science0.0100.011
Research integrity0.0050.011
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.015

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations38
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZootaxaSame topicDiptera species taxonomy and behaviorFrench-language works237,207