MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2473360060 · doi:10.5580/1eaa

Neonatal Citrobacter koseri meningitis and brain abscess

2009· article· en· W2473360060 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Internet Journal of Pediatrics and Neonatology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEscherichia coli research studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMeningitisBrain abscessCitrobacterMedicineNeonatal meningitisAbscessSurgeryEnterobacteriaceaeBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Citrobacter koseri meningitis is a very rare cause of neonatal meningitis. It is characterized by serious complications like cerebral abscesses and high mortality. This is the first neonatal case of cerebral abscesses in UK following C. koseri meningitis, who survived with no serious neurological deficit. Serial neuroimaging is the key to diagnose cerebral complications early. Neonatal meningitis is a well known serious clinical condition associated with significant morbidity and mortality12 which can be complicated by brain abscess formation and ventriculitis.3456 Although there has been a decrease in the overall mortality in the last decade attributable to improved supportive care and the use of more efficacious antibiotics such as third generation cephalosprorins,7 the incidence and morbidity attributed to this condition has remained largely unchanged.12 Up to forty-five percent of neonatal meningitis is caused by Gram negative bacilli, 123 and is associated with high morbidity7 and mortality of about eighty percent.4 Neonatal meningitis caused by Citrobacter koseri is extremely rare and is often complicated by brain abscess and ventriculitis, with only a few cases reported from the USA,345 India,8 Brazil,9 Israel,10 and Canada.11 In the UK, there have been ten reported cases of Citrobacter meningitis, 12131415 nine of which were C. koseri and one C. freundii.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Internet Journal of Pediatrics and NeonatologySame topicEscherichia coli research studiesFrench-language works237,207