MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2473591265 · doi:10.5539/gjhs.v9n2p127

The Effect of the Duration of Pre-Oxygenation before Endotracheal Suction on Hemodynamic Symptoms

2016· article· en· W2473591265 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Hossein Tavangar, Mostafa Javadi, Saeed Sobhanian, Fatemeh Forozan Jahromi

Bibliographic record

VenueGlobal Journal of Health Science · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRespiratory Support and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineOxygenationAnesthesiaHypoxemiaRepeated measures designAnalysis of varianceHeart rateSuctionOxygen saturationHemodynamicsPost-hoc analysisOxygenBlood pressureInternal medicineMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Hypoxia and hypoxemia are among the most common complications of endotracheal suctioning. These complications are often mitigated by the administration of oxygen 100% prior to endotracheal suction. Although several studies have supported the application of this method, none have yet specified the exact duration of pre-oxygenation required to be performed before endotracheal suction. The present study was therefore conducted to determine the effect of the duration of pre-oxygenation before endotracheal suction on heart rate and arterial oxygen saturation in patients in intensive care units. OBJECTIVES: This prospective clinical trial conducted on 63 eligible ICU patients under mechanical ventilator. Subjects randomly divided into three groups. Pre-oxygenation was carried out for 30 seconds in the first group, for one minute in the second group and for two minutes in the third group. All three groups were then hyper-oxygenated for one minute. Arterial oxygen saturation and heart rate were recorded on different occasions in the three groups. The data obtained were analyzed using the ANOVA, the one-way ANOVA, the post-hoc test and the repeated measure ANOVA. RESULTS: The results obtained showed a greater reduction in the mean O2sat during the suctioning episodes in the 30-second pre-oxygenation group compared to in the one-minute (P=0.046) and two-minute (P=0.001) pre-oxygenation groups. This mean reduction was also observed immediately after suctioning (P=0.001). The mean O2sat was lower in the 30-second pre-oxygenation group than in the one-minute pre-oxygenation group in minutes 5 (P=0.002) and 20 (P=0.001) of the suctioning. Similarly, the mean O2sat was lower in the 30-second pre-oxygenation group than in the two-minute pre-oxygenation group in minutes 5 (P=0.001) and 20 (P=0.001) of the suctioning. The results obtained through the ANOVA showed the lack of significant differences between the three groups in the mean variation in heart rate in the different stages of suctioning. CONCLUSIONS: According to the results obtained, one-minute and two-minute pre-oxygenations cause less disruption in arterial oxygen saturation compared to a 30-second pre-oxygenation. To achieve stability in arterial oxygen saturation and avoid hypoxemia caused by endotracheal suctioning, one-minute or two-minute pre-oxygenation is recommended in ICUs depending on the patient’s clinical conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGlobal Journal of Health Science→Same topicRespiratory Support and Mechanisms→French-language works237,207→