N-acetylcysteine prevented contrast-medium–induced nephropathy in primary angioplasty
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
TherapeuticsNovember 1, 2006N-acetylcysteine prevented contrast-medium–induced nephropathy in primary angioplastyMatthew James, MD, Braden Manns, MDMatthew James, MDUniversity of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada (M.J., B.M.)Search for more papers by this author, Braden Manns, MDUniversity of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada (M.J., B.M.)Search for more papers by this authorAuthor, Article, and Disclosure Informationhttps://doi.org/10.7326/ACPJC-2006-145-3-063 SectionsAboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail Source CitationMarenzi G, Assanelli E, Marana I, et al. N-acetylcysteine and contrast-induced nephropathy in primary angioplasty. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:2773-82. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16807414Clinical Impact RatingsHospitalists: Cardiology: Nephrology: References1 Pannu N, Wiebe N, Tonelli M. Prophylaxis strategies for contrast-induced nephropathy. JAMA. 2006;295:2765-79. [PMID: 16788132] Google Scholar2 Briguori C, Colombo A, Violante A, et al. Standard vs double dose of N-acetylcysteine to prevent contrast agent associated nephrotoxicity. Eur Heart J. 2004;25:206-11. [PMID: 14972420] Google Scholar Author, Article, and Disclosure InformationAffiliations: University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada (M.J., B.M.) PreviousarticleNextarticle Advertisement FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails November 1, 2006Volume 145, Issue 3Page: 63KeywordsAcute renal failureAllergy and immunologyAngioplastyBiomarkersBody weightClinical trialsCreatinineHeart failureHospitalistsIsotonicityMedical dialysisMorbidityMyocardial infarctionNephrologyRespiratorsSafety ePublished: 9 March 2020 Issue Published: November 1, 2006 Copyright & PermissionsCopyright © 2006 by American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.PDF downloadLoading ...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it