Speed control of sensorless induction generator by artificial neural network in wind energy conversion system
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study presents a new strategy for estimating the states (rotor flux and speed) and the load torque to implement a multivariable controller for a sensorless three‐phase squirrel‐cage induction machine in wind energy conversion systems. The multivariable control is carried out using input–output feedback law and its objective is to track profiles of the rotational speed and the rotor flux amplitude. The state estimation considerably improves the performance of rotor flux based model reference adaptive system in the variable speed region of operation. The technique uses Kalman filter as a rotor flux observer and an artificial neural network adaption mechanism to estimate the rotor speed. The state estimation requires only the measurements of the stator voltages and currents. The estimation method, for both states and torque, is not invasive as no mechanical sensors are needed. The wind energy conversion system and the proposed control‐estimation techniques are simulated in Matlab/Simulink software platform and tested using the OPAL‐RT real‐time simulator (OP5600) to verify the accuracy of the proposed control‐estimation method.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".