MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A phase 1 dose-escalation study of BBI503, a first-in-class cancer stemness kinase inhibitor in adult patients with advanced solid tumors.

2014· article· en· W2474470599 on OpenAlexaff
Scott A. Laurie, Derek J. Jonker, William J. Edenfield, Joe Stephenson, Deborah S. Keller, Matthew Hitron, Wěi Li, Youzhi Li, Keyur Gada, Yuan Gao, Chiang Li

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced Breast Cancer Therapies
Canadian institutionsOttawa Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineTolerabilityAdverse effectInternal medicineCancerPharmacokineticsGastroenterologyNauseaToxicityDiscontinuationOncologyPharmacology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

2527 Background: Targeting cancer stem cells (CSC) may hold significant therapeutic promise. BBI503 is an orally-administered first-in-class multi-kinase inhibitor with potent activity against CSC. Preclinically, potent anti-CSC and broad-spectrum anti-tumor and anti-metastatic activity was seen in vitro and in vivo. Methods: A first-in-man phase 1 dose escalation studyin patients with advanced cancer was conducted to determine safety, tolerability, RP2D, pharmacokinetics and preliminary anti-tumor activity of BBI503. BBI503 was given orally, continuously, in 28-day cycles until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or other discontinuation criteria were met. Results: Escalating doses from 10 mg to 450 mg once daily were administered to 26 patients. MTD was not reached. BBI503 was well tolerated, with mild GI adverse events, including grade 1, 2 diarrhea, abdominal cramping, nausea, anorexia. Grade 3 diarrhea was observed in 2 subjects at 450 mg once daily. BBI503 exhibited favorable pharmacokinetics with dose-dependent increases in plasma concentration up to 300 mg once daily. Inhibition of cancer stem cell markers was observed in biopsied tumor tissues. Of 20 evaluable patients, 11 (55%) had stable disease (SD) with a median time to progression of 16 wks. Of those patients with SD, tumor regression and/or prolonged stable disease (≥ 16 weeks) were observed in 10 (50% of all enrolled patients) (see Table). Clinical trial information: NCT01781455. Diagnosis Number of patients evaluable Number of patients with minor regression or SD ≥ 16 wks. Colorectal cancer 5 3 Head and neck cancer 2 2 Hepatocellular carcinoma 2 1 Renal cell carcinoma 1 1 Gastric/GEJ adenocarcinoma 1 1 Pancreatic neuroendocrine 1 1 Non-small cell lung cancer 1 1

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.317
Threshold uncertainty score0.593

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.439
Teacher spread0.397 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicAdvanced Breast Cancer TherapiesFrench-language works237,207