MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2474527130 · doi:10.1021/acs.joc.5b01752

Synthesis and Properties of Rhomboidal Macrocyclic Subunits of Graphdiyne-Like Nanoribbons

2015· article· en· W2474527130 on OpenAlexafffund
Maude Desroches, Marc‐André Courtemanche, Geneviève Rioux, Jean‐François Morin

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Organic Chemistry · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSynthesis and Properties of Aromatic Compounds
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsHOMO/LUMODelocalized electronMaterials scienceCrystallographyAlkyneRing (chemistry)Molecular orbitalBand gapAtomic orbitalMoleculePlanarChemistryCatalysisOptoelectronicsPhysicsOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rhomboidal macrocyclic subunits of graphdiyne-like nanoribbon (GDNR) bearing both alkyne and diyne units, allowing for multichannel π-conjugation, were synthesized using an oxidative Glaser-type ring closing reaction. These subunits, called the "meshes" of the nanoribbon, possess phenyl groups with decyloxy solubilizing chains on each corner. The yields of the ring closing reaction highly depend on the metal (Cu or Pd) catalyst used for the macrocyclization step. Increasing the width of the meshes from one macrocycle to two fused macrocycles resulted in a decrease of the bandgap by 0.23 eV as shown by optical spectroscopy. The optimized geometries of the meshes alongside their HOMO and LUMO orbitals were calculated using DFT calculations at the B3LYP/6-31+G** level of theory. The results showed a nearly planar conformation for both meshes with HOMO and LUMO orbitals entirely delocalized over the molecules.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Organic ChemistrySame topicSynthesis and Properties of Aromatic CompoundsFrench-language works237,207