Le programme de résidence en psychiatrie : la première année de la formation postdoctorale, mise à jour 2014
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le programme de residence en psychiatrie a bien evolue depuis la parution en 2001 de l’enonce de principes de l’Association des psychiatres du Canada (APC) sur le sujet de la formation medicale durant la residence1. Plus precisement, le College royal des medecins et chirurgiens du Canada (CRMCC) a publie un document sur les exigences de la formation specialisee en 2007 d’abord, puis une version actualisee en 2009, qui precise les exigences de la premiere annee de la formation postdoctorale2. Selon ces exigences, « cette annee de formation doit permettre d’acquerir une experience generale de la medecine, pertinente a la psychiatrie » (italiques ajoutes)2, p 1. Le contenu de la formation des 12 premiers mois de la residence varie toujours a un certain degre dans les 17 universites canadiennes, une souplesse que permettent les exigences de la formation specialisee etablies par le CRMCC (voir le tableau 1). Tableau 1 : Exigences de la formation specialisee en psychiatrie du College royal des medecins et chirurgiens du Canada2
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.027 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".