MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2475345428

New Directions in Metal Chalcogenide Nanochemistry

2012· dissertation· en· W2475345428 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jordan W. Thomson

Bibliographic record

VenueLibrary and Archives Canada (Government of Canada) · 2012
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicChalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNanochemistryChalcogenideNanotechnologyMaterials scienceMetalMetallurgy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Colloidal semiconductor nanocrystals have shown great promise in functional devices \nsuch as solar cells and LEDs, but still relatively little is understood about the chemistry of their formation and resulting structure. In this thesis, we describe the results of our study of ultrathin Bi2S3 nanowires, part of the emerging class of materials at the transition from molecular scale clusters to nanowires, from a chemical perspective. Using a complementary suite of techniques, we propose an atomically precise model of the nanowires accounting for both the inorganic core structure and ligand-surface interaction for purified dispersions. The growth process of the nanowires was studied using in situ NMR on reaction mixtures and information on the growth and reactivity not attainable with purified dispersions was gained. The small molecule reactivity of the sulfur-oleylamine precursor was elucidated and it was shown that H2S is produced in situ leading to the formation of Bi2S3. This knowledge allowed for the extension of the sulfur-oleylamine precursor to SemSn-oleylamine, which produces H2S and H2Se in situ leading to the formation of homogeneous solid-solution PbSxSe1-x nanocrystals with tunable stoichiometry. Through this work, we elucidated each stage of the nanowire \nformation from small molecule reactivity, to growth process, to solution phase structure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.427
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.147
Teacher spread0.143 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLibrary and Archives Canada (Government of Canada)Same topicChalcogenide Semiconductor Thin FilmsFrench-language works237,207