MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2475651383 · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139025454.003

Xenarchus: the man and his work

2011· book-chapter· en· W2475651383 on OpenAlexaff
Andrea Falcon

Bibliographic record

VenueCambridge University Press eBooks · 2011
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicClassical Antiquity Studies
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWork (physics)Computer scienceEngineeringMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Life From Strabo we learn that Xenarchus was originally from Seleucia on the Calycadnus in Cilicia Tracheia, but that he spent most of his life away from home, teaching philosophy first in Alexandria, then in Athens, and finally in Rome [T1]. Strabo adds that he himself attended Xenarchus’ lectures. Finally, he names two people that must have been very important in Xenarchus’ life: Arius and the emperor Augustus. Arius is Arius of Alexandria, a philosopher who may have been the same person as the doxographer Arius Didymus and the Stoic philosopher listed on the index locupletior to Diogenes Laertius’ Lives . Arius was not only a friend, a teacher, and a confidant of Augustus; he was also a senior political advisor and a very influential member of Augustus’ most inner circle. Strabo seems to suggest that the friendship with Arius played a significant role in Xenarchus’ career. More directly, it is possible that Xenarchus owed his friendship with Augustus to Arius. On the basis of this biographical information, we can date Xenarchus’ activity to the second half of the first century bce . Elsewhere Strabo tells us that he (Strabo) studied Aristotelian philosophy with Boethus, the Peripatetic philosopher native to Sidon. This piece of information has been combined with what Strabo says about Xenarchus to suggest that Boethus and Strabo were fellow students in Rome, and Xenarchus was their teacher. But the information in our possession does not justify this conclusion. In all probability, Strabo is saying that he was a student of Boethus, not that they were fellow students. Moreover, there is no evidence linking Boethus to Xenarchus, except what Alexander of Aphrodisias says in his Mantissa [T16]. There, Alexander names Boethus and Xenarchus as champions of the attempt to elaborate an Aristotelian doctrine of the first appropriate thing ( prôton oikeion ) out of what Aristotle says on love ( philia ). But this doctrinal agreement does not suffice to establish that Boethus studied with Xenarchus, or that Boethus and Xenarchus were personally close in any other way.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.036

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.012
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCambridge University Press eBooksSame topicClassical Antiquity StudiesFrench-language works237,207