Metacomedy, caricature and politics from <i>Knights</i> to <i>Peace</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
KNIGHTS We have already dealt in chapter three with the evidence for Eupolis' involvement in the composition of Knights . To recap, the conclusion was that the play borrows the overall schema of Eupolis' Noumeniai of Lenaea 425, in which a wicked prostates of Demos is replaced by an even worse one, plus at least two major characters. One is Paphlagon (a name chosen possibly because of the connection of this Black Sea territory with the export of hides and Cleon's involvement in that trade), possibly represented in Eupolis' play as a tanner, shoemaker and shoe-salesman (cf. Knights 315–21), and a recently acquired slave of Demos (cf. Knights 2). The other is Demos/Cratinus. The market-trader theme will have been calqued on Noumeniai too, with the strong possibility that Hyperbolus was represented there as a lamp-manufacturer and seller ( Knights 738–40). A final point of appropriation may be the rejuvenation of Demos. However, far from being an imitation or even a rip-off, Aristophanes' play in fact subverts the earlier comedy's political thrust (the replacement of Cleon by Hyperbolus and possibly the change of Demos from the old Cratinus to the young Aristophanes) by altering the person who gains the prostasia to someone in Eupolis' political circle and probably by throwing in a few other surprises designed to pour scorn upon his rival.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.015 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".