MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2476272165

Performance oriented partial checkpoint and migration of lam/mpi applications

2011· article· en· W2476272165 on OpenAlexaff
Peter Graham, Rajendra Singh

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDistributed and Parallel Computing Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSPMDComputer scienceDistributed computingParallel computingMessage passingSet (abstract data type)Process (computing)Cluster (spacecraft)SupercomputerMessage Passing InterfaceComputer networkOperating systemProgramming language
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In parallel computing, MPI is heavily used due to its support of popular cluster based parallel machines and the Single Program Multiple Data (SPMD) model. Normally cluster nodes are dedicated to a single parallel job/application but MPI could also be used with nodes that are concurrently shared by multiple users. In this case, nodes could become overloaded with work from other users. Even a few overloaded nodes can result in application slowdown. Thus, it is desirable to relocate affected processes in a running application to lightly loaded nodes by partial checkpointing and migrating of those processes. In some MPI applications, groups of processes communicate frequently with one another. Such groups must be near one another to ensure communication efficiency. Thus, if any member of a group is to be checkpointed and migrated, all should be. It must therefore be possible to identify such groups. I have built a prototype, using LAM/MPI, that supports partial checkpoint, migration and restart of MPI processes. To identify process groups for checkpoint and migration, I adapted TEIRESIAS (an algorithm for pattern discovery from bioinformatics) to identify frequent, recurring patterns of communication using data gathered by LAM/MPI. I then created predictors that use the discovered patterns to predict groups of communicating processes that should be checkpointed and migrated together. I have assessed the effectiveness of my technique using synthetic and real communication data (for a small set of representative applications) to show that my predictors can accurately predict process groups for those applications. Additionally, I have created a simple simulation system to allow me to explore scenarios related to network characteristics and overload conditions under which my system might provide useful speedup. Not all MPI applications will benefit from my approach (e.g. those with unpredictable communication patterns or large groups of frequently communicating processes). However, my experimental and simulation results suggest that my technique should be effective for a number of common application types, network characteristics and overload conditions. Using partial checkpoint and migration should therefore allow many long running applications to finish faster than if a subset of their processes was left running on overloaded nodes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDistributed and Parallel Computing SystemsFrench-language works237,207