MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Interaction of Obesity and Nocturnal Hypoxemia on Cardiovascular Consequences in Adults with Suspected Obstructive Sleep Apnea. A Historical Observational Study

2016· article· en· W2476583972 on OpenAlexaff
Tetyana Kendzerska, Richard Leung, Andrea S. Gershon, George Tomlinson, Najib Ayas

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of the American Thoracic Society · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicObstructive Sleep Apnea Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaSt. Michael's HospitalSunnybrook HospitalMount Sinai HospitalInstitute for Clinical Evaluative SciencesUniversity Health NetworkUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHazard ratioHypoxemiaObstructive sleep apneaObesityBody mass indexObservational studySleep apneaInternal medicinePolysomnographyConfoundingConfidence intervalStroke (engine)CardiologyHeart failureMyocardial infarctionApnea

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Rationale The interrelationships between obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and obesity are complex and bidirectional; however, current evidence regarding their combined effect on cardiovascular risk is limited and conflicting. Animal studies suggest that obesity may exacerbate the cardiovascular consequences of intermittent hypoxemia. Objectives In this historical observational study, we investigated whether obesity increases the effect of nocturnal hypoxemia on the incidence of cardiovascular events in adults with suspected OSA. Methods All adults with suspected OSA who underwent diagnostic polysomnography at a large academic hospital between 1994 and 2010 were linked to provincial health administrative data to determine a composite cardiovascular outcome (hospitalization due to heart failure, myocardial infarction, stroke, or revascularization procedures). Using a competing-risk model and controlling for confounders, hazards were compared between four groups: group 1 comprised obese patients (body mass index >30 kg/m2) with oxygen desaturation (>9 min of sleep spent with SaO2 <90%); group 2 comprised obese patients without desaturation; group 3 comprised nonobese patients with desaturation; and group 4 comprised nonobese patients without desaturation. Interaction was measured using the relative excess risk due to interaction. Measurements and Main Results A total of 10,149 participants were followed, with 17%, 25%, 8%, and 50% in groups 1–4, respectively. Over a median of 7.8 years, 896 (8.8%) first cardiovascular events occurred. Group 1 was associated with the highest hazard compared with the other groups, using group 4 as a reference (hazard ratio [HR] for group 1, 1.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.46–2.32; HR for group 2, 1.59, 95% CI, 1.29–1.95; HR for group 3, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.15–1.98). The relative excess risk due to interaction was −0.25 (95% CI, −0.78 to 0.27), indicating no interaction. Conclusions In adults with suspected OSA, the highest cardiovascular risk was found in obese patients with nocturnal oxygen desaturation; however, the effect of these two factors together does not exceed the effect of each factor considered individually.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.090
GPT teacher head0.372
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of the American Thoracic SocietySame topicObstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchFrench-language works237,207