Diflubenzurone toxicity upon the planarian Dugesia tigrina (Girard)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background and purpose: The main aim of this study was to determine the effect of low doses of insecticide diflubenzurone on the Dugesia tigrina (Gir.) species in laboratory conditions. Materials and methods: Individuals of planarian Dugesia tigrina (Gir.) were treated with 0.02 % and 0.01 % water solution of insecticide diflubenzurone for 24 hours. Mortality and behavioral, morphological, cytological and histological changes were monitored, as well as regeneration and the course of recovery. Morphological changes and behaviour were monitored daily by means of stereomicroscope. For cytological and histological analysis, on the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 6th and 11th day after the treatment two extremely damaged animals from each concentration were fixed, embedded into paraplast, cut, stained and immerse into Canada balsam. Results: Treatment with water solution of diflubenzurone resulted with mortality in the higher concentration. It also caused behavioural changes and extreme morphological, histological and histological damages. Anterior parts of planarian body were extremely damaged, but recovered successfully. In this part of the body greater amount of neoblasts and nerve tissue was present. After regenerative processes on the posterior part of the body certain lower number of permanent deformations was remarked. Less damaged planarians regenerated after the short period of time, but strongly damaged animals needed longer period for recovery. It took nine days for the complete regeneration of the damaged body parts. Conclusions: Used concentrations of diflubenzurone caused mortality, behavioral changes, as well as cytological and histolgical changes in treated planarians. Reticular cells and neoblasts take part in the formation of regeneration blastema. Results showed that the anterior parts of planarian body were more sensitive to diflubenzurone treatment than the posterior, but anterior parts regenerated faster and more successfully. After the regenerative processes, small amount of permanent deformations on the posterior parts of the body was established.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".