Topology optimization of a fully compliant prosthetic finger: Design and testing
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Traditional prosthetic fingers use rigid links and kinematic joints, which lead to the fingers that lack adaptability. This paper presents a new design of fingers which are fully compliant for prosthetic applications. A home-based topology optimization method was used for the structural synthesis and dimensional analysis in order to determine the topology and geometry of the finger. A prototype was manufactured and experimented for its performance. In order to evaluate the performance of the prosthetic finger, the forces and displacements of the input end and output were measured. A spring was attached at the output end to mimic the stiffness of the work-piece in order to evaluate the grasping ability. Finite element analysis was also performed to compare with the experimental results. It was found that the compliant prosthetic finger met the design requirements and overcome some problems present in the traditional prosthetic fingers. The home-made topology optimization method is reliable for the design of prosthetic finger.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it