MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2478050367 · doi:10.5539/mas.v10n8p243

Study of the Mediating Role of Organizational Citizenship Behavior in the Relationship of Workplace Spirituality with Customer Loyalty and Service Quality in Saman Bank

2016· article· en· W2478050367 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mohammad Hossein Kiyanzad, Nader Sh. Kandelousi, Soheila Sardar

Bibliographic record

VenueModern Applied Science · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicWorkplace Spirituality and Leadership
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLISRELMarketingLoyalty business modelService qualityBusinessOrganizational citizenship behaviorStructural equation modelingStatistical populationLoyaltyCustomer satisfactionPopulationSample (material)Stratified samplingOrganizational commitmentService (business)PsychologySociologySocial psychologyMathematicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In today highly competitive banking industry, customer loyalty and customer satisfaction with banking services are among the important preconditions for survival and growth of banks. In this context, the relationship between customers and employees providing services is of significant importance and in general it can be said that frontline employees may attract customers and gain their satisfaction and loyalty by providing services beyond their role requirements. Present research aims to study the role played by workplace spirituality in organizational citizenship behavior, service quality and customer satisfaction. In present applied research, a survey methodology was employed and questionnaire copies were distributed to the sample derived from a statistical population comprising of all staff and customers of north Tehran branches of Saman Bank. Random stratified sampling procedure was used to obtain the appropriate sample for present study. As a result of it, 230 questionnaires (equal to the total number of employees) and 341 questionnaires (according to a sample based on Krejcie & Morgan table with an estimated statistical population of 3000) were respectively distributed to employees and customers. Structural equation modelling (SEM) and LISREL software were used to study the relationships. Research findings confirmed all hypothesized relationships between the studied concepts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.057
Threshold uncertainty score0.993

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueModern Applied ScienceSame topicWorkplace Spirituality and LeadershipFrench-language works237,207