MétaCan
← all works

Implementing Sustainable Development

Why is this work in the frame?

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

About CanadaIts subject is Canada, wherever its authors sit.

No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Classifier prediction

metacan-v1-d91a1de5be90

Predictions imitate two machine teachers. Scores are not calibrated prevalence probabilities.

Classifier candidate
Not applicable
Classifier consensus
N/A
Teacher imitation scores

Codex

Other design0.893
Not applicable0.016
Theoretical or conceptual0.006
Simulation or modelling0.001
Case report0.001
Systematic review0.000
Bibliometrics0.000
Qualitative0.000
Observational0.000
Metaresearch0.000
Science and technology studies0.000
Bench or experimental0.000
Research integrity0.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.000
Scholarly communication0.000
Open science0.000
Randomized trial0.000
Non-randomized trial0.000
Meta-analysis0.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.000

Gemma

Not applicable0.990
Qualitative0.023
Open science0.007
Theoretical or conceptual0.005
Observational0.001
Science and technology studies0.001
Bibliometrics0.001
Bench or experimental0.000
Simulation or modelling0.000
Systematic review0.000
Metaresearch0.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.000
Scholarly communication0.000
Research integrity0.000
Randomized trial0.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.000
Non-randomized trial0.000
Meta-analysis0.000
Case report0.000

Machine scores (provisional)

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread
0.201 how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation status
score_only:v0-immature-baseline verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Abstract

Abstract This volume examines the response of governments in the industrialized countries to the challenge of sustainable development. It focuses on the response of central governments in Australia, Canada, Germany, Japan, Norway, the Netherlands, Sweden, the UK, the USA, and the EU. The study shows that sustainable development has been integrated into governmental idiom in most jurisdictions, and has come to be associated with a series of changes to the structures and approaches deployed to manage environmental problems. Yet, it also reveals significant differences of interpretation and priority across the governments surveyed. The study pays particular attention to various understandings of sustainable development, institutional reform, government engagement with other societal actors, national plans and strategies, and the policy areas of climate change and biodiversity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.