MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2479639214 · doi:10.1109/lmag.2016.2597216

Parallel Pumping of Spin Waves for Ferromagnetic Nanowires and Nanotubes With Circular Cross Sections

2016· article· en· W2479639214 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Magnetics Letters · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic properties of thin films
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsNanowireCondensed matter physicsSpin waveFerromagnetismMaterials scienceDipoleMagnetic fieldMicrowaveHamiltonian (control theory)PhysicsNanotechnologyQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Calculations are reported for the spin-wave instabilities in a ferromagnetic nanowire with circular cross section, as well as nanotubes, under conditions of parallel microwave pumping. The quantized spin waves are characterized by a one-dimensional wave vector along the nanowire and the external applied magnetic field is taken to be parallel to the longitudinal axis. In nanowires with lateral dimensions less than about 200 nm, the spatial quantization of the eigenmodes become predominant and our theory employs a microscopic (or Hamiltonian-based) dipole-exchange method analogous to that used recently for ultrathin films and nanowire stripes with rectangular cross section. Numerical applications are made to wires with different radii and comparisons are presented with nanowires having square cross sections. When our nanowire results are compared with those for macroscopic samples or for ultrathin films, it is found that the “butterfly curves” (threshold field vs. applied field) are significantly modified and show more structural features.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.095
Threshold uncertainty score0.678

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it