MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2479753146 · doi:10.1385/0-89603-547-6:187

GPI-Anchored Fusion Proteins

2003· book-chapter· en· W2479753146 on OpenAlexafffund
Malcolm L. Kennard, Gregory Lizée, Wilfred A. Jefferies

Bibliographic record

VenueHumana Press eBooks · 2003
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTrypanosoma species research and implications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersMedical Research Council Canada
KeywordsTransmembrane proteinPhosphatidylinositolPhospholipase CBiochemistryChemistryIntegral membrane proteinLipid bilayer fusionMembrane proteinPeripheral membrane proteinFusion proteinCell biologyMembraneBiologyRecombinant DNASignal transductionReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although most integral membrane proteins are bound to the lipid bilayer by a hydrophobic polypeptide transmembrane domain, a small functionally diverse group of proteins is uniquely anchored to the plasma membrane by the covalent attachment of a complex phospolipid anchor to the carboxyl terminus of the protein. This glycosylphosphatidyl inositol (GPI) anchor consists of a hydrophobic phospholipid, phosphatidylinositol, which attaches the carboxyl end of the protein to the outer lipid layer of the plasma membrane via a variable glycan chain and phosphoethanolamine ( 1 , 2 ). The functional role of the anchor is not clearly established, and proposals range from cell motility to cell signaling ( 1 , 3 , 4 ). The GPI-anchored protein can be released from the cell membrane by the action of a specific bacterial phospholipase, phosphatidylinositol phospholipase C (PI-PLC) ( 5 ). The PI-PLC cleaves the anchor at the phosphodiester bond between the phophinositol group and the lipid portion of the anchor ( Fig. 1 ). Diacyglycerol is left in the outer cell membrane, while the protein is released in a water-soluble form into the media with the hydrolyzed portion of the GPI anchor. Therefore, it is possible to harvest natural and recombinant GPI-anchored proteins in a controlled fashion by removing the cell growth medium and replacing it with a much smaller volume of PI-PLC solution ( 6 – 8 ). This procedure yields a concentrated preparation of the desired protein that is relatively free of contaminating proteins contributed by the cells or the medium. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.050

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.028

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.103
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHumana Press eBooksSame topicTrypanosoma species research and implicationsFrench-language works237,207