MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

[PP.30.02] IMPACT OF STRESS REDUCTION ON BLOOD PRESSURE CONTROL IN PATIENTS TREATED WITH PERINDOPRIL; SHAKE THE HABIT II

2016· article· en· W2479795032 on OpenAlexaffabout
M. Vasilevski, Rivelino Hamel, Emmanouil Rampakakis, John S. Sampalis

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Hypertension · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Health and Mental Health
Canadian institutionsServier (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPerindoprilMedicineBlood pressureDemographicsInternal medicinePhysical therapyStress managementDemography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: Stress management has been recognized by the Canadian Hypertension Educational Program (CHEP) as an essential lifestyle modification for hypertension. The study assessed the effectiveness of a patient – centric stress management tool on perceived stress and evaluated the effect of stress reduction on BP control of patients treated with perindopril. Design and method: This was an open label, prospective, randomized phase-IV study. Patients for whom the treating physician had prescribed perindopril independently of the study were enrolled from 74 community physicians across Canada and were randomized to a stress education group (SE) or a control group (CTRL). All patients received motivational letters encouraging them to adhere to the CHEP recommendations. The SE group also received educational material regarding the impact of stress on BP and suggestions on stress management with a CD of autogenic and progressive muscle stress reduction exercises. Main outcome measures were BP and Cohen's Perceived Stress Scale (PSS). Follow up was at weeks 4 and 16 after baseline. Results: A total of 5963 (CTRL: 2,966; SE: 2,997) completed the study. Mean (SD) age was 62 (13) years, 47% were female and 75% were Caucasian. Baseline mean (SD) SBP/DBP was 151 (9.75)/89 (8.61) mmHg. Demographics and baseline BP were similar for the two patient groups. The proportion of patients treated with perindopril 4 and 8 mg/day respectively was 61% and 16% at baseline and 38% and 37% at 16 weeks. By 16 weeks significant (P < 0.001) mean (SD) reductions in SBP/DBP of -20(13)/-10(9) mmHg were observed and 64% had achieved target BP. There was no between group difference with respect to change in BP, target BP and PSS at 16 weeks. After adjusting for relevant covariates improved stress management was associated with a significant reduction in SBP (-1.8 mmHg, P = 0.002) and DBP (-0.5, P = 0.213) and increased odds of target BP (OR = 1.4; P = 0.006). Conclusions: Perindopril was effective in reducing BP after 16 weeks of treatment. Improved stress management is associated with better BP control, Identification of effective stress management interventions must be a priority in BP management.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.318
Threshold uncertainty score0.973

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3180.116

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of HypertensionSame topicCardiac Health and Mental HealthFrench-language works237,207