MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2480872250 · doi:10.1109/itec-ap.2016.7512950

SiC devices performance overview in EV DC/DC converter: A case study in a Nissan Leaf

2016· article· en· W2480872250 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Yosra Attia, Ahmed Abdelrahman, Mohamed Hamouda, Mohamed Z. Youssef

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSilicon Carbide Semiconductor Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersTransport Canada
KeywordsElectrical engineeringSilicon carbideInsulated-gate bipolar transistorVoltageMaterials scienceTransistorDiodeSchottky diodeElectric vehicleBattery (electricity)Power (physics)Automotive engineeringSwitching timeOptoelectronicsComputer scienceEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents the technical and economical merits of using low losses fast switching Silicon Carbide (SiC) accumulated gate field effect transistor (ACCUFET) switches in comparison with a Hybrid module of Silicon (Si) IGBT with anti-parallel schottky barrier diode (SBD) in DC/DC converter applications of the Nissan Leaf electric vehicle (EV) motor drive. The performance of the car, at steady state conditions, is studied at different temperatures. The power losses, current, voltage, torque and speed results are given. The results showed lower total switching power losses with the SiC ACCUFET. This reduction in losses was recorded at different switching frequencies in comparison to the hybrid switch. The fast switching of SiC Trench ACCUFET reduces current-voltage cross-over losses and enables high frequency operation thus achieving high record efficiency. The high frequency operation will result in a smaller foot print of the converter together with a weight reduction; thus making the car lighter. It is expected that a lighter car will result in a longer range Nissan Leaf with the same battery. Increasing the car mileage of the battery and lowering the cost of magnetic components in the EV will surpass the higher cost of the SiC ACCUFET from an economical point of view.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.375
Threshold uncertainty score0.618

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSilicon Carbide Semiconductor TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207