MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2481287437 · doi:10.1017/cbo9781107261464.005

Africa as Legitimacy

2015· book-chapter· en· W2481287437 on OpenAlexaff
Éric T. Jennings

Bibliographic record

VenueCambridge University Press eBooks · 2015
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPolitical and Social Issues
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMemoirLegitimacyPerspective (graphical)Capital (architecture)Political scienceHistoryAncient historyArt historyArtLawVisual arts

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Brazzaville, Capital City From a Gaullist perspective, Brazzaville became the capital of legitimate France on August 28, 1940. According to Jacques Soustelle's memoirs: It was in Brazzaville, on French soil and only there, that Fighting France's provisional powers could see the light of day. Only there could they escape the mortal dangers of emigration. It was there that General de Gaulle created the Conseil de D'efense de l'Empire on October 27, 1940. In an organic declaration of November 16, also published in Brazzaville, and to which a magistrate from Pointe-Noire contributed judicial input, the Council solemnly refused to admit the Vichy regime's legitimacy. It was therefore in Brazzaville that Vichy's authority was defied, in Brazzaville that the empire was defended, and from Brazzaville that the struggle was coordinated. In this vision, the capital of FEA became a guarantor of Free France's independence, at once from the Axis and from Free France's own allies. The city on the Congo served as a legitimate capital for the movement in a way that the city on the Thames never fully could. Soustelle reminds us that London evoked the legacies of Huguenot, counterrevolutionary and Second Empire emigration from France. Furthermore, de Gaulle was something of a guest at his Carlton Gardens headquarters, while at Brazzaville his government operated on sovereign French territory. In Brazzaville, Free France endeavored to establish its legitimacy both legally and practically. Organic Act #1 literally invented the concept of Free French Africa. In fact, its hastily concocted governmental structure involved considerable haziness. Thus, Edgard de Larminat first held the title of delegate, before becoming high commissioner for Free French Africa. His mandate and its limits remained ill-defined vis-à-vis those of the governor-general of FEA, Félix Eboué. The movement rapidly set about instituting a Bulletin officiel de l'Afrique française libre , a record of decrees that began in Brazzaville long before being copied in London.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.040

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.017
Scholarly communication0.0070.006
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCambridge University Press eBooksSame topicPolitical and Social IssuesFrench-language works237,207