Tensile Strength of Friction Stir Spot Welded Dissimilar AA5754-to-AZ31B Alloys
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Friction stir welding (FSW) is a relatively new joining process. As a solid-state joining technique, FSW provides good potential for dissimilar materials, even for those considered to be "difficult" and "unweldable". As a variant, friction stir spot welding (FSSW) can have significant potential to replace riveting or resistant spot welding for aerospace and automotive applications. To date, limited work has been carried out on the FSSW of dissimilar material combinations. In this work, the tensile shear strength obtained is reported for a dissimilar 2-mm thick AA5754-to-AZ31 alloy system. The main process parameters investigated include tool rotation speed, tool plunge rate, dwell time and work-piece placement (i.e. either Al or Mg alloy on the top of the lap spot welds). The tensile shear strength is also compared with that obtained for similar AA5754-to-AA5754 and AZ31-to-AZ31 welds. Furthermore, the tensile shear strength is correlated with the joint geometrical dimensions and welding defects. Copyright © 2013 ASM International® All rights reserved.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".