MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2481354393 · doi:10.1017/cbo9781316257586.002

Pope and Talbot Inc. <i>v</i>. Government of Canada

2005· article· en· W2481354393 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueICSID Reports · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicInternational Arbitration and Investment Law
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExpropriationArbitrationTribunalJurisdictionLawInternational trade lawFree tradeTreatyPolitical scienceInvestment (military)International tradeEconomicsBusinessPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

43 Arbitration — North American Free Trade Agreement, Chapter 11 — UNCITRAL arbitration — Investor commencing arbitration proceedings under NAFTA, Chapter 11 — Whether Canada violating Articles 1102, 1105, 1106 and 1110 of NAFTA Arbitration — North American Free Trade Agreement, Chapter 11 — UNCITRAL arbitration — Jurisdiction — Investment disputes — Definition — Whether measure relating to trade in goods capable of being measure relating to an investment — Procedural requirements for bringing claim — Waiver of right to institute or continue national proceedings — Whether going to jurisdiction Arbitration — North American Free Trade Agreement, Chapter 11 — UNCITRAL arbitration — Procedure and evidence — Claim of Crown privilege — Whether available before UNCITRAL arbitral tribunal — Whether State required to identify documents and produce reasoned submissions regarding their confidentiality — Whether UNCITRAL Tribunal empowered to compel production of documents — Scope of solicitor–client privilege — Claim — Amendment to claim Treaties — Trade — Investment — North American Free Trade Agreement — Aims and objectives — Interpretation — Relationship with general international law — Requirement of national treatment — Minimum standard of treatment — Performance requirements Expropriation — Definition — North American Free Trade Agreement, Article 1110– Measures tantamount to expropriation — Meaning — Whether extending beyond concept of expropriation in general international law — Creeping expropriation Arbitration — Arbitration tribunal — UNCITRAL — North American Free Trade Agreement, Chapter 11 — Jurisdiction and powers — Procedure and evidence State responsibility — Treatment of aliens — Investor protection — North American Free Trade Agreement, Chapter 11 — National treatment — Meaning of “like circumstances” — Minimum standard of treatment — Fair and equitable treatment — Full protection and security — Use of terms in bilateral investment treaties — Expropriation Treaties — Interpretation — Principles of interpretation — Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, 1969, Articles 31 to 33 — Application to North American Free Trade Agreement Treaties — Interpretation — North American Free Trade Agreement, Chapter 11 — Article 1105 — NAFTA Free Trade Commission interpreting Article 1105 — Effect — Whether valid exercise of power — Whether binding — Whether operating retroactively — Proper interpretation of Article 1105 — Canada failing to produce documents relevant to negotiating history when requested — Effect on Tribunal’s work and Chapter 11 process — Distinction between 44 international law and customary international law — Nature and content of customary international law with respect to Article 1105 — Whether Investor entitled to damages under Article 1105 Damages — Heads of damages — Value of management time devoted to claim — Alleged losses flowing from shutdown of mills — Out of pocket expenses relating to Verification Review Episode — Out of pocket expenses directly incurred by Investor with respect to Interim Hearing — Whether recoverable Costs — Final phase of arbitration — Circumstances of case — Whether reasonable to apportion costs — Necessity to consider variety of aspects to reach reasonable result — Canada failing on important legal aspects of case — Difficulties caused by Canada’s failure to produce documents — Articles 38 and 40of UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules Interest — On Award on Damages — On Award on Costs — Rate of interest — Date from which interest payable

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.716
Threshold uncertainty score0.966

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.176
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueICSID ReportsSame topicInternational Arbitration and Investment LawFrench-language works237,207