Avaliação neuropsicológica das funções executivas de mulheres em estado de dependência química Neuropsychological assessment of the executive functions of women in a state of chemical addiction La evaluación neuropsicológica de las funciones ejecutivas de las mujeres en un estado de dependência química
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: Executive functioning preserved to maintain adaptive behavior is a prerequisite for obtaining favorable clinical outcomes in the treatment of subjects in addiction. Confirmation of the executive dysfunction hypothesis can provide subsidies to behavioral treatment of the subject with addiction. Objective: The study consisted of a neuropsychological assessment of executive functions of addicted women cocaine or crack. Method: The evaluation was made through medical history / physical examination, interviews and neuropsychological tests. For the characterization of the sample was used Anamnese Neuropsychological Protocol. Neuropsychological assessment of executive functions consisted of applying the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST), subtest Digit - Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS-III), Corsi blocks, Trail Making Test (TMT), Stroop Test and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment ( MoCA) in order to investigate eight executive components, namely: working memory, cognitive flexibility, categorization, verbal fluency, selective and alternating attention, visuomotor tracking and inhibitory control. Results: The results showed that women with substance abuse, the use of cocaine and crack, present executive dysfunction were found clinically significant relationship between use of time and deficits in executive functioning, indicating that the higher the dependence on time, more significant dysfunction executive. Descriptors: Executive Function; Neuropsychology, Temporary; Substance-Related Disorders.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".