MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2482109113

Method for semi-automated image segmentation of blood vessels in MRI images

2013· article· en· W2482109113 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Luis Alberto Souto Maior Neto

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of undergraduate research in Alberta · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSegmentationComputer scienceComputer visionArtificial intelligenceProcess (computing)Image qualityMATLABImage segmentationImage processingMedical imagingImage (mathematics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION Atherosclerosis is considered the main pathological process responsible for ischemic stroke [1]. It consists in the accumulation of fatty materials (plaque) in the wall of blood vessels. This phenomenon leads the vessel to thicken, which, consequently, results in less expansion of the vessel within a cardiac cycle. Also, the vessel tends to expand unevenly in the different directions. Medical imaging techniques such as Magnetic Resonance Imaging have been greatly used for diagnosis of atherosclerosis through visual evaluation of the images. However, due to the qualitative nature of these procedures, one can lead to ambiguous results depending on the quality of the obtained images and on the accuracy of the operator. Also, this procedure is very time-consuming, taking about 7-9 minutes per sequence of 16 phases. This project proposes a method for segmentation of vessels in MRI images with the use of image processing techniques coded in MATLAB, in order to solve time and accuracy issues. METHODS The developed program consists in five main parts: Data Input, User Input, Analysis and Correction, Radial Segmentation and Data Output. Data Input gathers all the necessary data such as the MRI scans and its parameters. The images are resized and have the contrast increased., User Input prompts the user to click in specific spots on the desired vessel, which is being shown as a figure. They are used as references for setting threshold values in respect to each direction from the center of the vessel. Then, the program runs by itself in Analysis and Correction by evaluating intensity values as a function of the angle from the center of the vessel (where zero degrees is east), interpolating it and then calculating intensity threshold as a function of the angle. In Radial Segmentation, sets of vectors are grown radially from the center of the vessel. They will stop growing once the threshold value in the current direction is reached in its extremity. Each vector length is recorded in an array that is used to calculate an average area of the vessel for each phase. Finally, in Data Output, the boundaries of the vessel are shown in a set of images (Figure 1), and the area values and dilation percentage are printed on the screen. Figure 1. Final plots. Each frame corresponds to one cardiac phase. The segmented boundaries are shown as green lines. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS Manual measurements made by 3 individuals on 1400 images of 10 volunteers, have been compared to the same measurements made by the program. It has been obtained a p-value of approximately 0.94, consequently showing that there is no significant statistical difference between manual and the semi-automated measurements. The time consumed in the process was reduced by a factor of 24, from about 8m per about 20s per sequence of 16 phase slides. Furthermore, one can use the sharp and accurate segmented borders of the vessel in order to qualitatively analyse the patient’s vessel.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.044

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.387
Teacher spread0.359 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of undergraduate research in AlbertaSame topicCerebrovascular and Carotid Artery DiseasesFrench-language works237,207