MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2482423317 · doi:10.20286/nova-jmbs-050204

Stem Cell Therapy for Male Infertility: A Review

2016· review· en· W2482423317 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Nathan Isaac Dibal, Martha Orendu Oche Attah

Bibliographic record

VenueNova Journal of Medical and Biological Sciences · 2016
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Biology and Fertility
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpermatogenesisBiologyTransplantationStem cellAndrologyInduced pluripotent stem cellGerm cellEfferent ductsInfertilityMale infertilityAzoospermiaSpermMedicineInternal medicineEmbryonic stem cellCell biologyEndocrinologyGeneticsGeneEpididymis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Infertility affects 15% of couples in reproductive age world-wide and male factor is solely responsible in about 50% of the cases and contributory in 30-40% of cases. Spermatogonial stem cells (SSCs) are small self-renewing cells found in the basal compartment of seminiferous tubules where they form the foundation of spermatogenesis and are required for the continuous production of sperm. Transplantation of spermatogonial stem cells results in a donor derived sperm production and fertility in rodent and non-rodent species like Goat. Transplantation of cryopreserved spermatogonial stem cells could help oncology patients undergoing radiotherapy or chemotherapy by prior isolation of the SSCs and transplantation after treatment. Induced pluripotent stem cells also have the ability to differentiate into late stage germ cells. The efficacy and safety of SSCs transplantation showed that offspring produced did not show any morphological differences or alteration of genetic material but is most effective through assisted reproduction and better on young/immature Animals. The transfer of germ cells through micro-injection of seminiferous tubules and cannulation of efferent ducts is most effective on rodent testis while injection into the rete testis guided by ultrasound was reported to be the best technique in higher Animals (Bulls and Apes). Researches are still ongoing to get a safe and successful method of SSCs transplantation with no or less side effects on humans.Keywords: Cryopreserved, Pluripotent, self-renewing, Spermatogonia, and Spermatogenesis

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.993
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.327
GPT teacher head0.453
Teacher spread0.127 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNova Journal of Medical and Biological SciencesSame topicReproductive Biology and FertilityFrench-language works237,207