MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2482597735 · doi:10.6090/jarq.50.191

An Evaluation of Minimum Tillage in the Corn-wheat Cropping System in Hebei Province, China: Wheat productivity and water conservation

2016· article· en· W2482597735 on OpenAlex
Xiaomei Yang, Changbin Yin, Hsiaoping Chien, Guichun Li, Fujio Nagumo

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJapan Agricultural Research Quarterly JARQ · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental and Agricultural Sciences
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersJapan International Research Center for Agricultural SciencesMcMaster University
KeywordsTillageAgronomyEnvironmental scienceMulchIrrigationConventional tillageCrop residueCrop yieldTopsoilCropping systemWater contentSoil waterCropAgricultureGeographyBiologySoil science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In North China where the main crops are winter wheat and summer corn, current agricultural practices involve minimum tillage for corn and full tillage for corn or wheat, and require large amounts of irrigation water, especially during the wheat growing season. Conservation tillage (CT) is a promising method of water conservation, but local farmers still question whether it will affect the yield of winter wheat. We conducted fieldwork during 2011-2014 in Xushui, Hebei, China, in order to compare the effects of various methods of tillage, mulching, and irrigation on the yield, soil moisture, and soil temperature under a summer corn/winter wheat double cropping system. Wheat grain yield in 2012-2013 did not differ significantly because of tillage, residue, and irrigation treatments. This means that reduced irrigation did not affect grain yield for all the treatments. However, in 2013-2014, the yield for minimum tillage with residue mulch (MTm) was significantly higher (19.5%) than that for full tillage with residue removal (FTr). Yields for MTm with reduced irrigation were 10.2% significantly higher than FTi with reduced irrigation. The positive crop response to MTm may have been due to relatively higher topsoil moisture and soil temperature under MTm than under FTi during the winter period. Minimum soil temperature for the inter-row at the 5-cm depth under MTm remained slightly higher than that under FTi during the winter of 2012–2013, with colder weather than in 2013-2014. Hence, after our two-year field experiment, we concluded that MTm resulted in higher grain yields as compared with FTr probably due to higher topsoil water content; MTm with reduced irrigation maintained high yields despite eliminating one round of irrigation. Therefore, MTm with reduced irrigation was more beneficial for winter wheat crop production in North China.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.895
Threshold uncertainty score0.530

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it