25+2 poles, 4.3 T wiggler at BMIT – 7 years operational experience
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The research program at the Biomedical Imaging and Therapy (BMIT) Facility at the Canadian Light Source (CLS) required a unique radiation source that would provide a wide beam fan with high critical energy and high dose rates. A superconductive wiggler was the only practical solution that could be installed inside the CLS ring. Design requirements were defined in 2005 [1-2]. The wiggler, optimized for a 3 GeV ring, was to match operating parameters of an equivalent hard X-ray source on a 6 GeV ring. Manufacturing started in 2006 and the wiggler was installed in November of 2007 [3-5]. Several modifications to external hardware and to the power supplies’ controls were implemented to address the air leaks into the He space and to provide the ability to change the field of the wiggler during normal operation without affecting other research groups. The original burst disk and pressure relief valves were replaced with commercial units. Most of the buna O-rings were replaced with metal O-rings, helping to provide air-tightness of external connections. Over the years, the nominal, no-load temperatures went up by 0.3 K at the LHe space and up by 4 K at the 50 K shield space due to deterioration of thermal links and insulation, resulting from thermal cycling and vibrations generated by cryo-coolers. In October of 2014 the wiggler went through major maintenance to improve the thermal links operation, to improve the LHe transfer line connection, to install additional heaters to mitigate potential ice growth, and to provide a separate exhaust path for the rupture disk port.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.052 | 0.043 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".