MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Sunitinib-related macrocytosis in patients with advanced renal cell cancer (RCC)

2007· article· en· W2483478704 on OpenAlexaff
Jennifer Price, R. Shaarbaf, Lori Wood

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRenal cell carcinoma treatment
Canadian institutionsQueen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMacrocytosisMedicineSunitinibInternal medicineGastroenterologyMean corpuscular volumeConcomitantAnemiaPopulationOncologyCancerHematocrit

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

15580 Background: Sunitinib is an oral multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor with anti-tumor and anti-angiogenic activity approved and widely used for the treatment of advanced RCC. Based on a clinical observation that several RCC patients receiving Sunitinib developed macrocytosis, this study was performed to describe and examine macrocytosis in this patient population. Methods: A retrospective review of all patients treated with Sunitinib for RCC from 08/05–11/06 was performed. Data regarding hematologic parameters (e.g. CBC, mean corpuscular volume- MCV), concomitant medications, liver function, and time on therapy (cycle length varied from 4–7 weeks) was recorded. Vitamin B12 and folate levels, iron studies, and thyroid function were recorded if available. A standardized, laboratory-specific MCV was used to define macrocytosis. Results: 43 patients formed the study cohort, receiving a median of 4 cycles (24 weeks) of Sunitinib. Overall 19 (44%) patients developed macrocytosis, at a median of 3 cycles (16 weeks). Of the 31 patients who received > 2 cycles of Sunitinib, 48% developed macrocytosis compared to 33% of the 12 patients receiving =2 cycles. Among all patients with macrocytosis, only 8 (42%) had anemia at the time. Of the 24 patients who did not become macrocytic, 19 (79%) had a continual rise in their MCV during therapy. Other causes of macrocytosis including vitamin B12 and folate deficiency, hypothyroidism, and other medications, did not contribute to the macrocytosis identified in this cohort. On preliminary analysis, it did not appear that macrocytosis was associated with response or toxicity. Conclusions: This is the first study to document the common occurrence of Sunitinib-associated macrocytosis in RCC patients. The risk of macrocytosis increased with duration of treatment. Macrocytosis did not appear to be associated with significant clinical sequelae; however this, as well as the mechanism of macrocytosis, requires further study. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.419
Teacher spread0.359 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicRenal cell carcinoma treatment→French-language works237,207→