The response of polar glaciers to Late Holocene climate change reconstructed from terrestrial geomorphological evidence on Svalbard
Bibliographic record
Abstract
(1) Queen Mary, University of London, Department of Geography, London, United Kingdom (s.lukas@qmul.ac.uk), (2) University Centre in Svalbard (UNIS), P.O. Box 156, Longyearbyen N-9171, Norway, (3) Geographisches Institut, Ruhr-Universitat Bochum, 44801 Bochum, Germany , (4) Department of Geography, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK, (5) Division of Geography and Environmental Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield AL10 9AB, UK, (6) Department of Earth & Atmospheric Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, T6G 2E3. Canada, (7) Center for Climate and Cryosphere, Institut fur Geographie, Universitat Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria , (8) Aberdeen Asset Management, Edinburgh EH2 2BY, Scotland , (9) Department of Physical Geography, University of Oslo, 0316 Oslo, Norway
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".