Bibliographic record
Abstract
In most South-East European countries, the institution of a patron saint has seen a revival in the post-Communist period. After 1990, representatives of medieval ‘national’ cultures formed the object of redefined cults, among them founding kings, martyrs, men of the church with outstanding reputation, and also popular heroes from national history. With the Romanians, as elsewhere, medieval patrons were usually saints and martyrs of the early church such as Nicholas, Andrew and George; national patron saints were the exception. In the Principality of Moldavia, the Greek neo-martyr John the New of Suceava was adopted by the ruling prince in 1415 as the country’s patron saint. A cult was created and reactivated several times from the fifteenth to the twentieth century. At the end of the last century, John was canonized properly, declared a pan-Romanian saint, but, in fact, lost his primary medieval functions as a patron and protector to far better-known, much more popular, heroes taken from national Romanian history. The purpose of this chapter is to examine why and how a medieval hero became a national symbol in post-Communist Romania.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".