Third-molar mineralization as a function of available retromolar space
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To test in the maxilla and mandible for an association between stage of third-molar (M3) mineralization and space in the jaws for M3 eruption. Mineralization is hypothesized to be delayed not only for impacted M3s but also for M3s with eruption space less than their mesiodistal crown diameter. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans of 37 females and 32 males aged 17-24 years, for a total sample of 197 upper and lower M3s, were used to assess the status of M3 eruption and measure the M3 crown diameter (CD) relative to the length of the retromolar space (RS). Stage of M3 mineralization was then compared between impacted and erupting M3s as well as between two conditions of relative eruption space (RS/CD ≥ 1 versus RS/CD < 1) using Mann-Whitney U tests. RESULTS: Impacted M3s were at significantly earlier (delayed) stages of mineralization compared to erupting M3s. Mineralization was also delayed for M3s with eruption space less than their mesiodistal crown diameter (e.g. RS/CD < 1). A moderate positive correlation between stage of M3 mineralization and space was seen in both jaws, and was stronger in the mandible. CONCLUSION: Our study shows for the first time that stage of M3 mineralization is associated not only with impaction but also with amount of retromolar space, and that these associations are consistent in upper and lower jaws. Present findings underscore that M3 mineralization stage may be a clinically useful predictor of M3 impaction that thus merits further investigation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it