MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2483899223 · doi:10.1017/cbo9781107478732.012

Machine-to-machine (M2M) communications

2015· book-chapter· en· W2483899223 on OpenAlexaff
Lingyang Song, Dusit Niyato, Zhu Han, Ekram Hossain

Bibliographic record

VenueCambridge University Press eBooks · 2015
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicIoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMachine to machineComputer scienceComputer networkThe InternetWirelessCellular communicationCellular networkControl communicationsData transmissionCommunications protocolMobile deviceCommunications systemTelecommunicationsInternet of ThingsEmbedded systemWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Wireless connectivity is rapidly expanding beyond traditional mobile devices used by humans. In the near future, many wireless devices (e.g., sensors and actuators) will be connected in the framework of the Internet-of-Things (IoT) [363]. In cellular networks, hundreds or thousands of devices can exist in one cell. Therefore, the concept of machine-to-machine (M2M) communications has been introduced to handle the transmission of a number of devices in the network. M2M communication, also known as machine-type communications (MTC), refers to mobile nodes communicating over a network without (or with minimal) human intervention. M2M communication enables ubiquitous connectivity among autonomous devices and/or Internet connectivity of MTC devices (i.e., communications between an MTC device and an M2M server or between two MTC devices). M2M communication is different from human-to-human (H2H) communication, which mainly involves voice calls, messaging, and web browsing. The goal of M2M communications is to increase the level of system automation by allowing the devices and systems to exchange and share data. Therefore, the protocol and data format are the major issues in M2M communications owing to the need to ensure seamless data and control flows. D2D communication can be considered as a type of M2M communication when the D2D user equipments UEs are in close proximity and have small amounts of data to transmit among themselves (e.g., in application scenarios relating to the control of appliances in the home). In this chapter, we provide an overview of M2M communications in Section 11.2. Specifically, we focus on MTC in Long Term Evolution (LTE) and LTE-Advanced (LTE-A). Section 11.3 presents the mechanisms to support MTC, i.e., a random-access (RA) procedure and random-access-channel (RACH)-overload control mechanisms. Section 11.4 introduces a performance-modeling technique based on queueing theory to analyze the performance of the RA mechanism for M2M communications. Finally, Section 11.5 gives a summary of the chapter and lists some important research directions. Machine-to-machine (M2M) communications M2M communication, which is undergoing the process of standardization by the Third Generation Partnership Project (3GPP), can support a wide range of applications (e.g., secured access and surveillance, metering and smart grid, and Internet-of-Things).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.081

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.005
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0240.016

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCambridge University Press eBooksSame topicIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingFrench-language works237,207